comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5cc9d0342
commit
773752b040
1 changed files with 32 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="joey"
|
||||
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||
date="2021-03-30T15:46:54Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
That is limited to fsck activities, so adding a display of specifically the
|
||||
last time a repo was fscked seems better than a more open-ended thing if
|
||||
it's going to use that information.
|
||||
|
||||
But, I don't think that indicating which repos were fscked recently is
|
||||
likely to really determine which repos are active.
|
||||
|
||||
And I don't think there's any cheap enough way to get at perhaps more general
|
||||
activity, such as changes to the content of a remote. Also a remote could
|
||||
have its contents unchanging and still be actively used frequently to
|
||||
access the data stored in it.
|
||||
|
||||
I wonder if perhaps using group information in git-annex info's list of
|
||||
repositories could address the same need. If nothing else you could
|
||||
put repos into an "active" group manually.
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe something like this:
|
||||
|
||||
semitrusted repositories:
|
||||
uuid -- foo@bar [origin] (active, transfer)
|
||||
uuid -- foo@bla
|
||||
uuid -- foo@baz [here] (active, client)
|
||||
uuid -- foo@whatever
|
||||
uuid -- foo@xyzzy (backup)
|
||||
|
||||
There could be a switch to filter to a specific group.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue