From 7472aa4655d6eeac5ccbe8b8dcd7ac1efa3d9349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:49:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] clarify --- ...omment_10_cdbd35ab0ba9c9157fd6530bebbc4650._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/git-annex_doesn__39__t_work_on_lustre:_waitToSetLock:_unsupported_operation___40__Function_not_implemented__41__/comment_10_cdbd35ab0ba9c9157fd6530bebbc4650._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/git-annex_doesn__39__t_work_on_lustre:_waitToSetLock:_unsupported_operation___40__Function_not_implemented__41__/comment_10_cdbd35ab0ba9c9157fd6530bebbc4650._comment b/doc/bugs/git-annex_doesn__39__t_work_on_lustre:_waitToSetLock:_unsupported_operation___40__Function_not_implemented__41__/comment_10_cdbd35ab0ba9c9157fd6530bebbc4650._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0b91fe8184 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/git-annex_doesn__39__t_work_on_lustre:_waitToSetLock:_unsupported_operation___40__Function_not_implemented__41__/comment_10_cdbd35ab0ba9c9157fd6530bebbc4650._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 10""" + date="2015-11-10T18:47:36Z" + content=""" +I think what yoh meant above was that -o lock (not `sync`) has a heavy +performance impact. Or at least a perceived one. And thus, lustre clusters +are not using it even though the feature is available and would probably be +find for git-annex's use if enabled. +"""]]