From 733a74a7e80eaec9d8b8483ec2b17fcf47ded1e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: prancewit Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:19:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...omment_6_ad1d78a28887af24d77b2b9e3739b68a._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_6_ad1d78a28887af24d77b2b9e3739b68a._comment diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_6_ad1d78a28887af24d77b2b9e3739b68a._comment b/doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_6_ad1d78a28887af24d77b2b9e3739b68a._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e7abc96774 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/devblog/day_641__an_alternative_smudge_filter/comment_6_ad1d78a28887af24d77b2b9e3739b68a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="prancewit" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f6cc165b68a5cca3311f9a1cd7fd027c" + subject="comment 6" + date="2022-09-13T11:19:53Z" + content=""" +This is probably waaaaay too late but I wanted to chime in with my 2 cents to the question from Joey. + +My personal preference would be to optimize for large files as opposed to many small files. My reasoning is that we can work around the many small files being slow issue by tar-ing them. This is also IMO usually the better option (at least for me) since we rarely have use cases where we have a gajillion small files that directly need to be accessible. + +"""]]