From 714afb8ede60bcdb38c9d4db10fdc572aeb9b4c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:35:40 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tag --- ...sfers_for_a_host_to_the_end_of_the_queue_when_one_fails.mdwn | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_move_pending_transfers_for_a_host_to_the_end_of_the_queue_when_one_fails.mdwn b/doc/todo/wishlist:_move_pending_transfers_for_a_host_to_the_end_of_the_queue_when_one_fails.mdwn index 966c59d95b..e50ebbde5e 100644 --- a/doc/todo/wishlist:_move_pending_transfers_for_a_host_to_the_end_of_the_queue_when_one_fails.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/wishlist:_move_pending_transfers_for_a_host_to_the_end_of_the_queue_when_one_fails.mdwn @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ Right now the assistant can have a huge list of pending transfers for certain ho I suggest that if a transfer fails for host X, and there are other pending transfers, say to host Y and from Z, then all other pending transfers to/from X gets pushed to the back of the queue, to avoid having to wait a long time for several transfers to time out before doing useful stuff. The prime example for me was this morning, when a laptop that was turned off had a huge amount of queued transfers to it, resulting in the assistant attempting a load of transfers to that host before it retrieved a new file that I had created on another machine yesterday. + +[[!tag design/assistant]]