From 6db4ee6c34316dd6e18751d045de5dcfacb190c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:01:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...4_2f496cb303c90eaefef955082e2bfb00._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Hardlink_keys_with_same_hash_but_differrent_ext/comment_4_2f496cb303c90eaefef955082e2bfb00._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/Hardlink_keys_with_same_hash_but_differrent_ext/comment_4_2f496cb303c90eaefef955082e2bfb00._comment b/doc/todo/Hardlink_keys_with_same_hash_but_differrent_ext/comment_4_2f496cb303c90eaefef955082e2bfb00._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e0f18a96c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Hardlink_keys_with_same_hash_but_differrent_ext/comment_4_2f496cb303c90eaefef955082e2bfb00._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 4""" + date="2021-07-14T15:57:43Z" + content=""" +@Atemu because the hard link to an unlocked file risks +it being modified, and losing the content of another key +is outside the risk profile allowed by annex.thin. + +Also it could be hard linked for other reasons, like +a local clone does, and that also should not be exposed +to modification. + +Moving all the object files to the same directory does not +help in the case of git-annex get, where the object files +don't exist yet. It would still need a way to find all the equivilant keys +to populate those. +"""]]