From 6d857b540aab2e80394984572ebd26be31ececff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://peter-simons.myopenid.com/" Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:31:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: Why isn't this package built with Cabal? --- .../comment_1_d9f7b851567445c7aa7ebbb440781819._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/install/comment_1_d9f7b851567445c7aa7ebbb440781819._comment diff --git a/doc/install/comment_1_d9f7b851567445c7aa7ebbb440781819._comment b/doc/install/comment_1_d9f7b851567445c7aa7ebbb440781819._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..616b3c4dd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/install/comment_1_d9f7b851567445c7aa7ebbb440781819._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://peter-simons.myopenid.com/" + ip="84.189.1.247" + subject="Why isn't this package built with Cabal?" + date="2011-03-23T11:31:06Z" + content=""" +It would be a lot easier to compile this package, if it had a Cabal file to describe the build; especially the build-time dependencies. Why isn't Cabal used? +"""]]