From 6bb284a24fea0b1a7f268be549e1b99fcd59d87a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Agenta Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:07:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_6_9b19ae8e8c0c70e3827c9f362c1c1dea._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Git-annex_assistant:_where_are_deleted_files_and_older_versions_saved__63__/comment_6_9b19ae8e8c0c70e3827c9f362c1c1dea._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Git-annex_assistant:_where_are_deleted_files_and_older_versions_saved__63__/comment_6_9b19ae8e8c0c70e3827c9f362c1c1dea._comment b/doc/forum/Git-annex_assistant:_where_are_deleted_files_and_older_versions_saved__63__/comment_6_9b19ae8e8c0c70e3827c9f362c1c1dea._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fbec80f927 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Git-annex_assistant:_where_are_deleted_files_and_older_versions_saved__63__/comment_6_9b19ae8e8c0c70e3827c9f362c1c1dea._comment @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Agenta" + subject="comment 6" + date="2015-11-18T18:07:51Z" + content=""" +Hello joey, + +but that doesn't use any kind of data deduplication, am I correct? In my particular use case the indirect backup repo could grow huge so I may be better of avoiding that. +"""]]