From 6b56cd1fcc46571c59c8206e86f6d0321e0dc597 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yarikoptic <yarikoptic@web>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:01:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_21_062098e1f54b874467793e4487a45a9b._comment  | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/design/exporting_trees_to_special_remotes/comment_21_062098e1f54b874467793e4487a45a9b._comment

diff --git a/doc/design/exporting_trees_to_special_remotes/comment_21_062098e1f54b874467793e4487a45a9b._comment b/doc/design/exporting_trees_to_special_remotes/comment_21_062098e1f54b874467793e4487a45a9b._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dfb5cb4569
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/design/exporting_trees_to_special_remotes/comment_21_062098e1f54b874467793e4487a45a9b._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="yarikoptic"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
+ subject="comment 21"
+ date="2018-02-07T20:01:53Z"
+ content="""
+Ok, gotcha.  Shouldn't then EXTENSION entries also be somehow versioned per each one of them? or if needed a new extension would be born by appending a version to its name (e.g. as with all those imap, imap2, imap3, ... ;-))
+"""]]