This commit is contained in:
parent
2b1059032b
commit
68db7bba43
1 changed files with 13 additions and 0 deletions
13
doc/forum/can_git-annex_replace_ddm__63__.mdwn
Normal file
13
doc/forum/can_git-annex_replace_ddm__63__.mdwn
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
Hi,
|
||||
a few years ago I wrote a tool called 'ddm'. The code is overengineered and the script is more complicated then it should be,
|
||||
but I think it demonstrates some good use cases, and I wonder how well git-annex can fulfill the requirements for those use cases - maybe I should remove ddm and start hacking with git-annex instead.
|
||||
|
||||
To answer this question, you should read the section about the possible dataset types on http://dieter.plaetinck.be/ddm_a_distributed_data_manager.html, and the example at the bottom of that page. it demonstrates the idea behind the "selection" dataset to always try to keep a subset (the most appropriate, based on the output of some script) of files "checked out".
|
||||
the introduction section on https://github.com/Dieterbe/ddm/raw/358f7cf92c0ba7b336dc97638351d4e324461afa/MANUAL should further clarify things, as well as give some more good use cases (as you can see it's a bit more about [semi-]automated workflows then purely tracking what's where)
|
||||
|
||||
So I'm not sure, maybe the way to go for me is to make git-annex my "housekeeping about which data is where" backend and make ddm into a set of policies and tools on top of git-annex.
|
||||
|
||||
Any input?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
Dieter
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue