From 6845c1e0203e3100959bc6e7785f8d12565a4b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 12:16:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...comment_1_946e2679cafd2c74a3b0b408e39f2d8d._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/key_checksum_from_chunk_checksums/comment_1_946e2679cafd2c74a3b0b408e39f2d8d._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/key_checksum_from_chunk_checksums/comment_1_946e2679cafd2c74a3b0b408e39f2d8d._comment b/doc/todo/key_checksum_from_chunk_checksums/comment_1_946e2679cafd2c74a3b0b408e39f2d8d._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c112bc9c26 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/key_checksum_from_chunk_checksums/comment_1_946e2679cafd2c74a3b0b408e39f2d8d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2019-05-06T16:10:17Z" + content=""" +Parallizable checksums exist, I would rather add support for a standard one +to git-annex than roll my own. In fact, I already did when I added +BLAKE2SP224 etc which are 8-way parallel and also can be optimised by SIMD +instructions on less parallel systems. +"""]]