Added a comment: sshfs ? and no sync from special remote to 2nd git-annex ?
This commit is contained in:
parent
331b968cae
commit
67f5b6e669
1 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="diepes"
|
||||
ip="105.227.34.36"
|
||||
subject="sshfs ? and no sync from special remote to 2nd git-annex ?"
|
||||
date="2013-03-29T22:09:49Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
* It sound to me it would be 1st prize if the cloud provider supported the git-annex functionality over ssh.
|
||||
* Then it could be a full git-annex repo, and used for recovery if my laptop with the git info gets lost.
|
||||
* From special remotes \"These can be used just like any normal remote by git-annex\"
|
||||
* Your comment \"No, special remotes do not contain a copy of the git repository\"
|
||||
|
||||
* so a special remote is
|
||||
|
||||
1. \"A. just a remote filesystem, that contains the objects with sha1 names ? \"
|
||||
2. \"B. there is no git info and thus no file name & directory details or am i missing something ?\"
|
||||
3. \"C. you can't use the remote as a cloud drive to sync changes e.g. file moves, renames between two other git-annex repositories ? (no meta data)\"
|
||||
4. \"D. the data on the cloud/rsync storage can not be used directly it has to moved into a git-annex capable storage location. \"
|
||||
|
||||
* Would it not be better to mount the remote storage over ssh(sshfs) and then use full git-annex on mounted directory ?
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue