From 66f44f634eacef1f8bc9255809a2ec15963aff89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://id.clacke.se/" Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:04:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_3_e9c44ea364513f090844f46af2ea46a1._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Big_repository_vs._multiple_small/comment_3_e9c44ea364513f090844f46af2ea46a1._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Big_repository_vs._multiple_small/comment_3_e9c44ea364513f090844f46af2ea46a1._comment b/doc/forum/Big_repository_vs._multiple_small/comment_3_e9c44ea364513f090844f46af2ea46a1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..063260ba10 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Big_repository_vs._multiple_small/comment_3_e9c44ea364513f090844f46af2ea46a1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://id.clacke.se/" + nickname="Claes" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-04-17T14:04:31Z" + content=""" +Yeah, git does not have the concept of checking out subdirectories that subversion does. You could, however, have different branches with different content that live in the same repo and therefore share the same git-annex backend, so there could be overlap between what files are in what branch without them using up much extra disk space. +"""]]