From 6532b1ed0ca76cb2a4b473c64e493b191346b518 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:03:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...ment_1_5c3ceb845a45e50784f7098bfbf94df1._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/linux_standalone_tarballs/comment_1_5c3ceb845a45e50784f7098bfbf94df1._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/linux_standalone_tarballs/comment_1_5c3ceb845a45e50784f7098bfbf94df1._comment b/doc/forum/linux_standalone_tarballs/comment_1_5c3ceb845a45e50784f7098bfbf94df1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..64a37f366f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/linux_standalone_tarballs/comment_1_5c3ceb845a45e50784f7098bfbf94df1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.154.0.149" + subject="comment 1" + date="2012-09-29T16:03:36Z" + content=""" +I'll be curious to see if the standalone tarball works on such a system.. it might need a newer libc +than RHEL5 has. + +Conversely, that'd make it a good system to build the tarball on, so it's built to work with a nice old libc. :) + +I have a machine where I could put chroots to do both 64 bit and 32 bit builds, but I don't know if I'll automate it there. Too lazy.. +"""]]