Added a comment: Differing reliability among remotes
This commit is contained in:
parent
73d400fe83
commit
645f5dce2d
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="tomdhunt"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/02694633d0fb05bb89f025cf779218a3"
|
||||
subject="Differing reliability among remotes"
|
||||
date="2023-06-12T22:58:41Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
I'm looking for a way to express that remotes may be of differing reliability. E.g. some remotes are on RAIDs that are robust to disk failures, but others are on single, possibly external disks. I would like copies of a file on a reliable remote to count for more than those on an unreliable one, so that e.g. git-annex requires two copies on single disks but allows one on a RAID.
|
||||
|
||||
Is there a way to do this via the copies logic? Or some other method?
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue