From 62bbc15a8ae1cd4109e69c981ea96afe346f4ea8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya_Shlyakhter Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:07:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_8_9dccdd3a9556ceef54e318cd5c8a50ad._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/internals/comment_8_9dccdd3a9556ceef54e318cd5c8a50ad._comment diff --git a/doc/internals/comment_8_9dccdd3a9556ceef54e318cd5c8a50ad._comment b/doc/internals/comment_8_9dccdd3a9556ceef54e318cd5c8a50ad._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6cd3e4f154 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/internals/comment_8_9dccdd3a9556ceef54e318cd5c8a50ad._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Ilya_Shlyakhter" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1647044369aa7747829c38b9dcc84df0" + subject="comment 8" + date="2018-09-19T16:07:44Z" + content=""" +\"Each subdirectory has the name of a key in one of the key-value backends. The file inside also has the name of the key.\" -- is it necessary for the file inside to also have the name of the key? Repeating the already long key name leads to very long symlink targets. Could the file inside just be 'f.txt' (or whatever the extension is)? + +Also, the terms \"key\" and \"name of the key\" are used in various places; are these the same thing? +"""]]