From 6281cd30e6230a1f7b974b3af6c7832861ccc17a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://launchpad.net/~krastanov-stefan" Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:18:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: Status of this issue --- .../comment_2_80d1080bf6e82bd8aaccde9d7c1669c7._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_80d1080bf6e82bd8aaccde9d7c1669c7._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_80d1080bf6e82bd8aaccde9d7c1669c7._comment b/doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_80d1080bf6e82bd8aaccde9d7c1669c7._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d531914ab3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Slow_transfer_for_a_lot_of_small_files./comment_2_80d1080bf6e82bd8aaccde9d7c1669c7._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://launchpad.net/~krastanov-stefan" + nickname="krastanov-stefan" + subject="Status of this issue" + date="2014-12-27T15:18:42Z" + content=""" +I was unable to find a way to tell git-annex that certain remotes should receive multiple transfers in parallel. Is this implemented yet or on the roadmap? If neither would modifying the webapp to bear this logic without touching git-annex itself be a solution (asking mainly because it can be done with a greasemonkey script)? +"""]]