Added a comment

This commit is contained in:
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U 2013-08-02 07:21:50 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 24cd572a7c
commit 60ecabd8ba

View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 2"
date="2013-08-02T07:21:50Z"
content="""
Using symmetric keys is significantly cheaper, computation-wise.
The scheme of encrypting symmetric keys with asymmetric ones is ancient, well-proven, and generally accepted as a good approach.
Using per-key files makes access control more fine-grained and is only a real performance issue once while creating the private key and a little bit every time more than one file needs to be decrypted as more than one symmetric key needs to be taken care of.
"""]]