From 5fc8c2b07b97baf7f08f9360ca375ad73aea2934 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmX5gPNK35Dub-HzR0Yb3KXllbqc0rYRYs" Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:52:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: bucket/folder s3 remotes --- ...mment_4_38c0b062997fde1ad28facc05d973e83._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/special_remotes/S3/comment_4_38c0b062997fde1ad28facc05d973e83._comment diff --git a/doc/special_remotes/S3/comment_4_38c0b062997fde1ad28facc05d973e83._comment b/doc/special_remotes/S3/comment_4_38c0b062997fde1ad28facc05d973e83._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8c17f7d644 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/special_remotes/S3/comment_4_38c0b062997fde1ad28facc05d973e83._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmX5gPNK35Dub-HzR0Yb3KXllbqc0rYRYs" + nickname="Eduardo" + subject="bucket/folder s3 remotes" + date="2012-08-09T10:52:07Z" + content=""" +it'd be really nice being able to configure a S3 remote of the form `/` (not really a folder, of course, just the usual prefix trick used to simulate folders at S3). The remote = bucket architecture is not scalable at all, in terms of number of repositories. + +how hard would it be to support this? + +thanks, this is the only thing that's holding us back from using git-annex, nice tool! +"""]]