comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
aff6c12949
commit
5fb307f1c5
2 changed files with 21 additions and 17 deletions
|
@ -24,20 +24,3 @@ configs.
|
|||
|
||||
Is it at all common to set `git config fetch.fsckObjects true` or
|
||||
`git config receive.fsckObjects` true?
|
||||
|
||||
> BTW, I have to mention that I'm deeply unhappy for git for making this
|
||||
> change, with such a
|
||||
> [weak justification](https://github.com/git/git/commit/a33fea0886cfa016d313d2bd66bdd08615bffbc9),
|
||||
> and so little care for breakage.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The change came after a security fix which involved symlinks and
|
||||
> `.git/objects`, but that was a symlink *inside* `.git/objects`,
|
||||
> which is entirely different than a symlink pointing into the
|
||||
> `.git` directory.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> While it's understandable that someone encountering a
|
||||
> symlink related security hole may want to throw out the baby with the
|
||||
> bathwater, what they have actually done here is to only throw out the
|
||||
> baby. This change will not prevent the class of security hole that
|
||||
> motivated it.
|
||||
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="joey"
|
||||
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||
date="2024-05-21T21:47:38Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
BTW, I have to mention that I'm deeply unhappy for git for making this
|
||||
change, with such a
|
||||
[weak justification](https://github.com/git/git/commit/a33fea0886cfa016d313d2bd66bdd08615bffbc9),
|
||||
and so little care for breakage.
|
||||
|
||||
The change came after a security fix which involved symlinks and
|
||||
`.git/objects`, but that was a symlink *inside* `.git/objects`,
|
||||
which is entirely different than a symlink pointing into the
|
||||
`.git` directory.
|
||||
|
||||
While it's understandable that someone encountering a
|
||||
symlink related security hole may want to throw out the baby with the
|
||||
bathwater, what they have actually done here is to only throw out the
|
||||
baby. This change will not prevent the class of security hole that
|
||||
motivated it.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue