comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8b7328ccf
commit
5d478ec38e
1 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="joey"
|
||||||
|
subject="""comment 3"""
|
||||||
|
date="2025-01-07T20:40:02Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
It would need some way for a special remote to indicate to git-annex that
|
||||||
|
it is in this unusual class of remotes where not having an url is the same as
|
||||||
|
content no longer being present in it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Implementing that would just make some more remotes have a special case,
|
||||||
|
which seems even harder to remember. I'd rather remove the special case,
|
||||||
|
but of course that will break existing workflows.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And it is unusual. Consider a S3 remote. It can have an url recorded for a
|
||||||
|
object stored in it, but forgetting the url doesn't mean that the S3 bucket
|
||||||
|
no longer contains the file. If git-annex behaved this way for S3, it would
|
||||||
|
be broken in a way that could be expensive to the user.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(The special case is not currently implemented for bittorrent special
|
||||||
|
remote. But it also doesn't record urls in a user-visible way actually.)
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue