Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1eabddee6
commit
5d0c336994
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="https://launchpad.net/~liori"
|
||||
nickname="liori"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/e1d0fdc746b3d21bb147160d40815e37b257b9119774d21784939b2d3ba95a91"
|
||||
subject="comment 2"
|
||||
date="2018-08-17T21:58:03Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
So, indeed it works. However, syncing a large archive (2TB, ~1M objects) over several USB HDDs at the same time ended up a bad idea: inevitably at some point every process tried syncing with the same, slowest, repository, and lack of good I/O concurrency on a USB-connected HDD killed all performance. I'm guessing that introducing some targetted locking could probably help, or even maybe just randomizing the order in which repositories are pulled from/pushed to.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue