mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2025-04-11 13:22:41 -04:00
commit 5c9a6af5f8
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DB12DB0FF05F8F38
3 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/forum/Authentication_for_URL_downloads/comment_2_2bb64609b66a24d1c071342cb75ac8cd._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="tomdhunt"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/02694633d0fb05bb89f025cf779218a3"
subject="comment 2"
date="2025-04-10T20:25:30Z"
content="""
Just passing the `--cookie` option to `curl` doesn't do it; what I need is to automatically fetch the current cookies from the browser and use those every time, i.e. to run custom code at download time. The old `web-download-command` option would have worked fine; alternatively, a setting to run a script to generate the curl options would also work.
"""]]

3
doc/forum/path-specific_configuration_of_autocommit.mdwn Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
Is there any way to make the assistant (presumably also sync, etc) autocommit only in particular directories?
I usually want to manage things myself, but autocommit would make it possible to use annex alongside some other automated tools if I moved their data directories under annex.

10
doc/todo/encrypt_just_the_annex_on_git+annex_hosting_site/comment_5_e3c67afcb36ba91a31de740b3dd02ba3._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="msz"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6e8b88e7c70d86f4cfd27d450958aed4"
subject="comment 5"
date="2025-04-10T16:56:50Z"
content="""
Thank you, this is very informative!
Could such a special remote use the same \"transport\" as the underlying remote (thinking of p2p http in particular), which would mean the same authentication & the same set of permissions server side?
"""]]