From 5ab5ced0c290ff57ceaf2fa4fdfc4a91aec262b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://www.rfc1149.net/" <Sam@web>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:35:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_5_a85ccf2f09ebe87147f8761b81a02326._comment   | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Using_a_revoked_GPG_key/comment_5_a85ccf2f09ebe87147f8761b81a02326._comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Using_a_revoked_GPG_key/comment_5_a85ccf2f09ebe87147f8761b81a02326._comment b/doc/bugs/Using_a_revoked_GPG_key/comment_5_a85ccf2f09ebe87147f8761b81a02326._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ff441671f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Using_a_revoked_GPG_key/comment_5_a85ccf2f09ebe87147f8761b81a02326._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://www.rfc1149.net/"
+ nickname="Sam"
+ subject="comment 5"
+ date="2013-08-19T11:35:52Z"
+ content="""
+Indeed, removing the revoked key and putting the new one would be acceptable, there is no reason to keep the revoked one around.
+"""]]