From 5a8b15f6db3925049955ad996a7ae40ed5b7944d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:46:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- .../comment_3_270c5156c8adce0aff86eda5f2746703._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/annex.addunlocked_in_gitattributes/comment_3_270c5156c8adce0aff86eda5f2746703._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/annex.addunlocked_in_gitattributes/comment_3_270c5156c8adce0aff86eda5f2746703._comment b/doc/todo/annex.addunlocked_in_gitattributes/comment_3_270c5156c8adce0aff86eda5f2746703._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..bfbc9afeab --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/annex.addunlocked_in_gitattributes/comment_3_270c5156c8adce0aff86eda5f2746703._comment @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 3""" + date="2022-02-21T19:40:50Z" + content=""" +Yes, annex.addunlocked with a matching expression was +implemented in 2019 and accomplishes the same thing +as this would have, without the problems of using git attributes. +"""]]