From 5a257dba881afa2c92577e2f5c815ed59958268d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:34:48 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...comment_3_1d3acf47e3eff3680c1639de12823940._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/import_tree_from_rsync_special_remote/comment_3_1d3acf47e3eff3680c1639de12823940._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/import_tree_from_rsync_special_remote/comment_3_1d3acf47e3eff3680c1639de12823940._comment b/doc/todo/import_tree_from_rsync_special_remote/comment_3_1d3acf47e3eff3680c1639de12823940._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2420173ae5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/import_tree_from_rsync_special_remote/comment_3_1d3acf47e3eff3680c1639de12823940._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 3""" + date="2023-06-23T16:33:32Z" + content=""" +@yarikoptic yes, importtree remotes can be read-only. + +I do think this would be a good reason to implement +[[importtree_only_remotes]]. +"""]]