From 58e897b96613975673e7a751bf6f26320e5c60bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jnkl Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 21:32:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- .../Reasonable_annex.bloomcapacity__63__.mdwn | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Reasonable_annex.bloomcapacity__63__.mdwn diff --git a/doc/forum/Reasonable_annex.bloomcapacity__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Reasonable_annex.bloomcapacity__63__.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b5cafce72e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Reasonable_annex.bloomcapacity__63__.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +What is a reasonable value for ```annex.bloomcapacity``` in this situation and in what unit? + + local annex keys: 670671 + local annex size: 2.62 terabytes + annexed files in working tree: 1410199 + size of annexed files in working tree: 3.52 terabytes + combined annex size of all repositories: 2.63 terabytes + annex sizes of repositories: + 2.62 TB: b2e77041-584e-4699-947d-ef5004273901 -- pudong [here] + 7.39 GB: 42a53a13-7ad6-43a5-95ef-813d4f8c1a6f -- [batam_payload] + backend usage: + SHA256E: 1410199 + bloom filter size: 32 mebibytes (appears too small for this repository; adjust annex.bloomcapacity) + +I don't really understand what happens when the bloom filter is too small.