From 57449307e1381d8874aa8828431e3e65773a49b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:02:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..692b307b10 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Special_remote_public_key_encryption_issue/comment_3_eac16bf98a6e87461ba2f3ab7e990b2b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="216.145.95.162" + subject="comment 3" + date="2014-05-17T17:02:15Z" + content=""" +I dont think it's possible for gpg to prompt for a passphrase when all it has is a public key, so I think you copied the private key too. + +gpg agents can cache your passphrase. +"""]]