Added a comment: why option vs manual chmod
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d6e805d28
commit
54d8fbcf19
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/8122123b4c2bc77187e32d7e025f7d445d7a08de1ba532237876a31159ac01da"
|
||||
subject="why option vs manual chmod"
|
||||
date="2016-10-17T23:11:10Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
as far as I see it
|
||||
|
||||
- much easier to specify the option instead of figuring out which files were unlocked and need to be chmodded (some might be under git, etc)
|
||||
- probably would be notably (avoiding double file-tree traversal) faster in case of unlocking large number of files
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue