mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

AWS tells me that the Reduced Redundancy storage class is less cost effective than Standard and not recommended

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
meribold 2020-06-08 14:58:48 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 634c66ea49
commit 52412b773b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
doc/special_remotes/S3.mdwn
View file

@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ the S3 remote.
* `storageclass` - Default is "STANDARD". * `storageclass` - Default is "STANDARD".
Consult S3 provider documentation for pricing details and available Consult S3 provider documentation for pricing details and available
storage classes. storage classes. For example, the s3cmd(1) man page lists valid storage class names for Amazon S3.
When using Amazon S3, if you have configured git-annex to preserve When using Amazon S3,
multiple [[copies]], consider setting this to "REDUCED_REDUNDANCY" if the remote will be used for backup or archival,
to save money. and so its files are Infrequently Accessed, "STANDARD_IA" is a
good choice to save money (requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0).
Or, if the remote will be used for backup or archival, If you have configured git-annex to preserve
and so its files are Infrequently Accessed, "STANDARD_IA" is also a multiple [[copies]], also consider setting this to "ONEZONE_IA"
good choice to save money. (Requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0) to save even more money.
When using Google Cloud Storage, to make a nearline bucket, set this to When using Google Cloud Storage, to make a nearline bucket, set this to
"NEARLINE". (Requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0) "NEARLINE". (Requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0)