AWS tells me that the Reduced Redundancy storage class is less cost effective than Standard and not recommended

This commit is contained in:
meribold 2020-06-08 14:58:48 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 634c66ea49
commit 52412b773b

View file

@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ the S3 remote.
* `storageclass` - Default is "STANDARD".
Consult S3 provider documentation for pricing details and available
storage classes.
When using Amazon S3, if you have configured git-annex to preserve
multiple [[copies]], consider setting this to "REDUCED_REDUNDANCY"
to save money.
storage classes. For example, the s3cmd(1) man page lists valid storage class names for Amazon S3.
Or, if the remote will be used for backup or archival,
and so its files are Infrequently Accessed, "STANDARD_IA" is also a
good choice to save money. (Requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0)
When using Amazon S3,
if the remote will be used for backup or archival,
and so its files are Infrequently Accessed, "STANDARD_IA" is a
good choice to save money (requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0).
If you have configured git-annex to preserve
multiple [[copies]], also consider setting this to "ONEZONE_IA"
to save even more money.
When using Google Cloud Storage, to make a nearline bucket, set this to
"NEARLINE". (Requires a git-annex built with aws-0.13.0)