Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
This commit is contained in:
commit
501e00054f
7 changed files with 101 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="dhess"
|
||||
ip="173.247.200.7"
|
||||
subject="Choose a friendly/unintimidating name"
|
||||
date="2012-09-13T00:32:15Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
You've already decided to accommodate mom by choosing ~/Desktop as the default location, so you should be consistent: choose a name that means something to people. \"Annex\" and \"GitAnnex\" are good branding, but not very user-friendly. (Contrast with \"Dropbox\", the default folder name for Dropbox -- good branding *and* reasonably meaningful.)
|
||||
|
||||
\"Shared\" is friendly, but implies that you're sharing with other people, which isn't necessarily the case. (You should reserve the name \"Shared\" for a sub-directory of the default directory, anyway, if/when the time comes to implement sharing URLs to your g-a-a objects with other users.)
|
||||
|
||||
I think that \"Synced\" is fine. Most English-speakers will know what it means, and it's a good description of what g-a-a does.
|
||||
|
||||
Don't worry whether we like it or not. Nobody who comments here, nor, likely, anyone who votes, will use the default name anyway ;)
|
||||
"""]]
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ locally paired systems, and remote servers with rsync.
|
|||
Help me prioritize my work: What special remote would you most like
|
||||
to use with the git-annex assistant?
|
||||
|
||||
[[!poll open=yes 0 "Amazon S3" 0 "Box.com" 0 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 0 "Tahoe-LAFS" 0 "OpenStack SWIFT" 0 "Google Drive" 0 "Amazon Glacier"]]
|
||||
[[!poll open=yes 4 "Amazon S3" 5 "Box.com" 10 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 0 "Tahoe-LAFS" 1 "OpenStack SWIFT" 1 "Google Drive" 1 "Amazon Glacier"]]
|
||||
|
||||
This poll is ordered with the options I consider easiest to build
|
||||
listed first. Mostly because git-annex already supports them and they
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
|
||||
nickname="Jimmy"
|
||||
subject="comment 1"
|
||||
date="2012-09-13T08:39:59Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
I've been looking at ceph for various reasons in work, it supports a swift interface as well as it's own restful api. so +1 for swift (and any s3 compatible api).
|
||||
"""]]
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
|
||||
nickname="Richard"
|
||||
subject="comment 2"
|
||||
date="2012-09-13T09:07:02Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
Swift has its own API but offers a S3 compatibility layer. Last I tried that layer, it did not work.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue