mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: great to see such a large scale effort ongoing

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnx8kHW66N3BqmkVpgtXDlYMvr8TJ5VvfY 2015-03-06 04:47:30 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 7a69e039c5
commit 4f96684f85
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
doc/design/iabackup/comment_1_d33c0910973bc37ce81bf434017e11fd._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnx8kHW66N3BqmkVpgtXDlYMvr8TJ5VvfY"
nickname="Yaroslav"
subject="great to see such a large scale effort ongoing"
date="2015-03-06T04:47:30Z"
content="""
and I would still maintain my view that removing intermediate directory withing .git/annex/objects whose current roles is simply to provide read-only protection might half the burden on the underlying file system, either annex repo(s) are multitude or a single one [1]. lean view [2] could also be of good use as well[2]. Similar exercises with simulated annex'es with >5M files also \"helped\" to identify problems with ZOL (ZFS on Linux) caching suggesting that even mere handling of such vast arrays of tiny files (as dead symlinks) might give filesystems a good test, so the leaner impact would be -- the better.
[1] e.g. https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/32#issuecomment-70523036
[2] https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/25
"""]]