From 4f4234797e372902581659f5323ba4eaa2e8c7ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yarikoptic Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:25:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_3_2bb944b19503dcf90fdf55e5098a2c02._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/git_annex_test_never_exits__63__/comment_3_2bb944b19503dcf90fdf55e5098a2c02._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_test_never_exits__63__/comment_3_2bb944b19503dcf90fdf55e5098a2c02._comment b/doc/bugs/git_annex_test_never_exits__63__/comment_3_2bb944b19503dcf90fdf55e5098a2c02._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ed0234223a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_test_never_exits__63__/comment_3_2bb944b19503dcf90fdf55e5098a2c02._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="yarikoptic" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4" + subject="comment 3" + date="2022-11-29T22:25:42Z" + content=""" +> I have re-ran the command to see if the bug replicates.. + +note: it was considerable amount of time (days?) for it to take there ;) I made a copy `test_fs_testonly.py` where I removed all other \"benchmarks\" prior running `annex test` -- might get there faster if works so feel free to interrupt and rerun that one. That code is old (circa 2014 ;)) , and I should do some face lift but haven't had a chance yet :-/ +"""]]