From 4c6d26bac424f6a838cea864f4c35523673829a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://edheil.wordpress.com/" Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:44:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_6_b068924802f3917e3e005350cb0cc2a2._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_6_b068924802f3917e3e005350cb0cc2a2._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_6_b068924802f3917e3e005350cb0cc2a2._comment b/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_6_b068924802f3917e3e005350cb0cc2a2._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c48e8c4296 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_6_b068924802f3917e3e005350cb0cc2a2._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://edheil.wordpress.com/" + ip="99.54.57.201" + subject="comment 6" + date="2013-04-27T21:44:19Z" + content=""" +I *think* that'd work... the only thing would be that the SSH remote wouldn't get any files that *weren't* in archive directories, right? They'd migrate from the client to the backup to satisfy numcopies, and that would be it, two copies and we're done. Since it's not in an archive directory, the ssh remote doesn't want it. +"""]]