annex.backend is the new name for what was annex.backends
It takes a single key-value backend, rather than the unncessary and confusing list. The old option still works if set. Simplified some old old code too. This commit was sponsored by Thomas Hochstein on Patreon.
This commit is contained in:
parent
935b48a7bb
commit
4c1e3210fa
9 changed files with 82 additions and 49 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="joey"
|
||||
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||
date="2017-05-09T18:06:34Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
When git-annex is adding a file, a backend can chose to not
|
||||
generate any key, and then it will try the next backend in the list.
|
||||
|
||||
The only backend that does that is the URL backend.
|
||||
So if someone lists URL first for some reason, it'll fall back to a backend
|
||||
that is usable. It could just as well crash in that edge case; the
|
||||
annex.backends UI happened before the needs of backends were perfectly
|
||||
understood. (As did the "backend" name...)
|
||||
|
||||
Anyway, I see the use case, but.. `git annex import` actually honors
|
||||
annex.backend settings in .gitattributes before annex.backends in
|
||||
git-config. So, relying on it using the latter to make it check multiple
|
||||
backends won't always work. I don't think it would be good to complicate
|
||||
the .gitattributes annex.backends and --backend to support a list of
|
||||
backends.
|
||||
|
||||
It seems it would be just as fast for you to run git-annex import once per
|
||||
backend, rather than compliciating it to try multiple backends.
|
||||
|
||||
I think that if annex.backends were not a list for historical reasons,
|
||||
I'd be suggesting a small shell script is your best option.
|
||||
|
||||
And so rather than add a new feature just because annex.backends is
|
||||
historically a list, I'd rather perhaps deprecate annex.backends as
|
||||
unncessarily complicated, and make annex.backend be a single-backend
|
||||
setting. (Just did that.)
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry this didn't quite go the way you wanted! If there is a disadvantage
|
||||
to the simple shell script option, please do let me know..
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue