mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
yarikoptic 2018-01-24 03:10:53 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 4c6edbc8e6
commit 4a80feb6ef
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/forum/Filesystem_recommendation___40__ext4__44___btrfs__44___xfs__44___you_name_it__41____63__/comment_1_fcf7f132f771de28553bd20f4fb014cb._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="yarikoptic"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
subject="comment 1"
date="2018-01-24T03:10:53Z"
content="""
Just ran into this question. Might still be of interest: for our datalad.org project I did some benchmarking of various filesystems a few years back. Here you can find the final report: [http://old.datalad.org/test_fs_analysis.html](http://old.datalad.org/test_fs_analysis.html) -- I settled on a bunch of software raid5s with BTRFS on top of them. So far (for years), quite good. snapshots and [btrbk](http://digint.ch/btrbk/) are also a blessing. I use the same btrfs also as docker backend.
"""]]