Add bug report about missing SHA3 support in the amd64 version
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8ecd3fb7c
commit
484ee68095
1 changed files with 51 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
|||
### Please describe the problem.
|
||||
|
||||
All the new wonderful SHA3_* backends are gone from the Linux AMD64 build of 5.20150825-g7826f84. They exist in the i386 version (5.20150824-g8529cb2), though. It's probably compiled without Cryptonite support or something.
|
||||
|
||||
### What steps will reproduce the problem?
|
||||
|
||||
Everything involving any of the SHA3_* backends result in an "unknown backend SHA3_*" error with the amd64 build (5.20150825-g7826f84). The i386 version (5.20150824-g8529cb2) works.
|
||||
|
||||
wget https://github.com/sunny256/utils/raw/master/tests/ga-fsck-size-files/annex-backends.tar.gz
|
||||
tar xzf annex-backends.tar.gz
|
||||
cd annex-backends
|
||||
git annex fsck
|
||||
|
||||
results in
|
||||
|
||||
[snip]
|
||||
fsck SHA384.txt (checksum...)
|
||||
ok
|
||||
fsck SHA384E.txt (checksum...)
|
||||
ok
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_224.txt (unknown backend SHA3_224)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_224E.txt (unknown backend SHA3_224E)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_256.txt (unknown backend SHA3_256)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_256E.txt (unknown backend SHA3_256E)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_384.txt (unknown backend SHA3_384)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_384E.txt (unknown backend SHA3_384E)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_512.txt (unknown backend SHA3_512)
|
||||
|
||||
skipping SHA3_512E.txt (unknown backend SHA3_512E)
|
||||
fsck SHA512.txt (checksum...)
|
||||
ok
|
||||
fsck SHA512E.txt (checksum...)
|
||||
ok
|
||||
[snip]
|
||||
fsck WORM.txt ok
|
||||
(recording state in git...)
|
||||
|
||||
### What version of git-annex are you using? On what operating system?
|
||||
|
||||
Newest official builds from downloads.kitenet.net . Debian GNU/Linux all the way.
|
||||
|
||||
### Have you had any luck using git-annex before? (Sometimes we get tired of reading bug reports all day and a lil' positive end note does wonders)
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, yes. It rules. :) One of the most important programs I use because I have all my valuable stuff in it. My files have never been safer.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue