mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: Include/exclude

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
http://meep.pl/ 2012-10-06 08:40:23 +00:00 • committed by admin
parent eaac10ac1d
commit 45f408bc3c
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/design/assistant/blog/day_99_shotgun/comment_1_12bb8f54bb13ea20ac4187a2301d77ca._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://meep.pl/"
ip="193.23.174.18"
subject="Include/exclude"
date="2012-10-06T08:40:23Z"
content="""
It seems that example 2 reads weird for filtering because exclude/include say *what to do* while copies/in say *what to test*. An alias (maybe \"glob\") for include should be acceptable both ways (largerthan=10mb or glob=junk/\* or not glob=\*.mp3).
That said, I would vote for keeping PCEs. And actually the simple \"not (copies=trusted:2 or in=usbdrive)\" does not read significantly worse than with \"dontwant\". (In *my bikeshed* we would have \"all\" == \"glob=\*\" and \"except\" == \"and not\").
"""]]