From 44defe8b70a299a66050e8c60fe7f46daeed6661 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joey.kitenet.net/" Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:39:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_2_6fc874b6c391df242bd2592c4a65eae8._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/wishlist:_simpler_gpg_usage/comment_2_6fc874b6c391df242bd2592c4a65eae8._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/wishlist:_simpler_gpg_usage/comment_2_6fc874b6c391df242bd2592c4a65eae8._comment b/doc/forum/wishlist:_simpler_gpg_usage/comment_2_6fc874b6c391df242bd2592c4a65eae8._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..29eb11622a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/wishlist:_simpler_gpg_usage/comment_2_6fc874b6c391df242bd2592c4a65eae8._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joey.kitenet.net/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 2" + date="2012-04-29T02:39:20Z" + content=""" +The encryption uses a symmetric cipher that is stored in the git repository already. It's just stored encrypted to the various gpg keys that have been configured to use it. It would certianly be possible to store the symmetric cipher unencrypted in the git repo. + +I don't see your idea of gpg-options saving any work. It would still require you to do key distribution and run commands in each repo to set it up. +"""]]