From 42f1ea72de337407dd63bfbde145f57f86f388bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:47:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] followup --- ..._b3fc7c5f6acfa23b6bfd0f709d2f6b96._comment | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/annex_get_-J_16_via_ssh_stalls_/comment_19_b3fc7c5f6acfa23b6bfd0f709d2f6b96._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/annex_get_-J_16_via_ssh_stalls_/comment_19_b3fc7c5f6acfa23b6bfd0f709d2f6b96._comment b/doc/bugs/annex_get_-J_16_via_ssh_stalls_/comment_19_b3fc7c5f6acfa23b6bfd0f709d2f6b96._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2aa574f9c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/annex_get_-J_16_via_ssh_stalls_/comment_19_b3fc7c5f6acfa23b6bfd0f709d2f6b96._comment @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 19""" + date="2018-11-05T15:42:45Z" + content=""" +I've seen the test fail that way, where apparently all gets from the remote +repo are failing, on the autobuilders once or twice, but not reproducably, +so have not been able to track it down yet. + +(I was running the test suite hundreds of times overnight +in a loop to reproduce and fix other intermittent test failures +just before the v7 release, and never reproduced that failure pattern.) + +If you can reproduce that test failure we can work on debugging +it on a different bug report. + +Anyway, since it replied to DATA for that key, the fix in +[[!commit 0b053b96119c1a2d6c2d03ba7f98f032e89b8b66]] almost certianly can't +be for the same problem as this bug. +"""]]