mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: Oh yes please 🤩

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
nobodyinperson 2023-08-22 16:48:58 +00:00 • committed by admin
parent 6115bced71
commit 42683457d0
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
doc/todo/command_to_list_keys_for_old_versions_of_files/comment_1_43c11d9467b4d4460aa97bfb88b4896f._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="nobodyinperson"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/736a41cd4988ede057bae805d000f4f5"
subject="Oh yes please 🤩"
date="2023-08-22T16:48:58Z"
content="""
`unusedkeys` would be consistently named with `git annex unused`. Would it make sense to teach `git annex unused` that? It could be taught to accept paths as arguments (it doesn't currently, right?) and then only operate on those to find old versions. Then no new command is necessary and people already know `unused`. The workflow would be:
```
# two-step
git annex unused file.txt
git annex move --unused --to there
# new option to only list keys for further scripting
git annex unused --onlykeys file.txt | xargs ...
# maybe --batch is a better name 🤷
```
"""]]