thought
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7fcda861f
commit
415d394222
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ and precache them.
|
||||||
> log, it will actually be read twice.) This is a surprising result,
|
> log, it will actually be read twice.) This is a surprising result,
|
||||||
> and I don't understand why it's slower, but backburnered this
|
> and I don't understand why it's slower, but backburnered this
|
||||||
> optimisation for now.
|
> optimisation for now.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> > Hmm, but `git annex get` does not need location log access when
|
||||||
|
> > the object is already present. So that was the wrong thing to benchmark
|
||||||
|
> > this with. `copy --to` would be a better benchmark. To speed up get,
|
||||||
|
> > it would need to check inAnnex before caching the location log.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Another thing that the same cat-file --buffer approach could be used with
|
Another thing that the same cat-file --buffer approach could be used with
|
||||||
is to cat the annex links. Git.LsFiles.inRepoDetails provides the Sha
|
is to cat the annex links. Git.LsFiles.inRepoDetails provides the Sha
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue