From 40be2467b63cc13c5b8dfa1405125641571c99e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: arand Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:07:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_7_826fd82cdf9b1c79c9b555ca26c2c176._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/added_branches_makes___39__git_annex_unused__39___slow/comment_7_826fd82cdf9b1c79c9b555ca26c2c176._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/added_branches_makes___39__git_annex_unused__39___slow/comment_7_826fd82cdf9b1c79c9b555ca26c2c176._comment b/doc/bugs/added_branches_makes___39__git_annex_unused__39___slow/comment_7_826fd82cdf9b1c79c9b555ca26c2c176._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c2dbd18109 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/added_branches_makes___39__git_annex_unused__39___slow/comment_7_826fd82cdf9b1c79c9b555ca26c2c176._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="arand" + ip="130.243.226.21" + subject="comment 7" + date="2013-08-12T18:07:44Z" + content=""" +Hmm, probably, do you think this way of getting everything and then doing the filtering could work reasonably in git-annex? Assuming \"git cat-file --batch\" is the main bottleneck, reducing the amount of runs for it would still likely be an improvement? +"""]]