mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2013-01-02 12:59:47 -04:00
commit 402f59710a
5 changed files with 57 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="Steve"
ip="92.104.175.136"
subject="comment 2"
date="2013-01-01T23:51:53Z"
content="""
I filed the bug because I thought the inconsistent behavior was bad. For example; If you move the data to a repo which doesn't know about the unsynced remote, it'll happily get dropped with dropunused as opposed to being considered in use in the current repo.
There probably aren't too many people who want to have remotes set that are usually unreachable, and I can work around it now that I know it exists.
If it is expected behavior, feel free to close the bug.
"""]]

15
doc/forum/Calculating_Annex_Cost_by_Ping_Times/comment_1_9b4a6bc8d52ecbbdd537e8cf76757a80._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 1"
date="2012-12-30T23:01:39Z"
content="""
You may want to use hop count, not ping times, for a rough guesstimate of distance.
Generally speaking, this is a highly non-trivial problem that's subject to university research projects so unless you find a well-maintained third party tool to solve this problem, it's unlikely that you will find a truly general solution.
Anyway, look into mtr for your distance measurements.
Richard
"""]]

8
doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_7_03a4dfaf3bd73d41c6f3c3fab0a6a922._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/2grhJvAC049fJnvALDXek.6MRZMTlg--#eec89"
nickname="John"
subject="sizes has git-annex support"
date="2012-12-30T22:47:42Z"
content="""
Just to note that I already added git-annex support to my \"sizes\" utility on Hackage several months back. With -A, it shows you storage totals with annex symlinks computed fully resolved.
"""]]

13
doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_8_fc6ddb4dc075ee42368863c1b026dbf7._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="Steve"
ip="92.104.175.136"
subject="git repo is now up"
date="2013-01-01T23:39:33Z"
content="""
sunny256, the git repo is now accessible at <http://git.mysteryvortex.com>
Markus, never used the -m option myself. I added it in git it'll be in the next tarball. (I plan to go through the du man page and add all appropriate options soon)
John, I wasn't aware of your sizes utility. I'll look into it.
"""]]

8
doc/forum/multiple_urls_for_the_same_UUID/comment_1_de7410d8824a864c4d106c9f1afaec3f._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joeyh.name/"
ip="4.152.246.6"
subject="comment 1"
date="2012-12-30T04:19:48Z"
content="""
Yes, this is absolutely supported. If it's trying to `get` a file and it fails to access the first remote, it'll even automatically fall back to using the second. I do similar things with my own remote, for example I have a foo that uses ssh with a foo-local that uses NFS.
"""]]