From 3ef766c4444696b4961fa8a93053725f72a6db3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:16:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...nt_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment b/doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d1bd57feac --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/webapp_--listen_port_is_not_used__63__/comment_3_2d18df9587b52cbb7c34bfce2e0f2fb2._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 3""" + date="2024-01-18T21:13:42Z" + content=""" +IPv6 would beg to differ about `:\d+` ;-) + +Actually, it may be that your address:port was treated as some IPv6 mixed +IPv4, iirc something like that is a thing. + +> it was to have some static port I could keep an ssh redirect pointing to so I could investigate behavior of the remote running annex webapp. + +You would still need to copy over the url though to get the access key +for the webapp.. +"""]]