From 3d55a7ac026d81928f43e74acab72f676b3b9941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:07:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ..._e5babe3bc4535946ee04e8339403fda4._comment | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/special_remotes/rclone/comment_2_e5babe3bc4535946ee04e8339403fda4._comment diff --git a/doc/special_remotes/rclone/comment_2_e5babe3bc4535946ee04e8339403fda4._comment b/doc/special_remotes/rclone/comment_2_e5babe3bc4535946ee04e8339403fda4._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..084df436a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/special_remotes/rclone/comment_2_e5babe3bc4535946ee04e8339403fda4._comment @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""Re: Need for git-annex-remote-rclone""" + date="2024-03-22T15:01:43Z" + content=""" +That's right, I have actually thought before that enough people use it that +it would make sense to either build it in as haskell or ship the program +with git-annex in a kind of contrib. + +With that said, there is also something to be said for distributing +maintenance, and I think I'd at least want a committment to maintain it if +it were added to git-annex, since git-annex-remote-rclone already has +ongoing maintenance. + +Another angle is [[forum/New_external_special_remote_for_rclone]] which +might see the special remote built into rclone itself, and so able to take +advantage of rclone's internal API. That might supplant the shell script if +it turns out to be better. +"""]]