Merge remote-tracking branch 'branchable/master'

This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2011-03-28 16:19:45 -04:00
commit 3b2cbf2104
10 changed files with 130 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 1"
date="2011-03-21T13:15:03Z"
content="""
Maybe I will run into issues myself somewhere down the road, but generally speaking, I really really like the fact that files are immutable by default.
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
nickname="Jimmy"
subject="comment 4"
date="2011-03-28T15:41:56Z"
content="""
In my \"sources\" repo on x00, the current setting is this \"ignorecase = true\" it was the first repo that I created before I clone it elsewhere and pull my changes back, it is on a HFS+ partition which is case insensitive and it is replicated on a portable hdd with a bare repo on a exfat partition. I wonder if my portable disk has a partially borked repo :P
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
nickname="Jimmy"
subject="comment 5"
date="2011-03-28T15:51:11Z"
content="""
I also failed to mention, that in the case when i have stray log files after what has happened in comment 2, I get this left over after a commit when git is confused...
<pre>
jtang@x00:~/sources $ git status
# On branch master
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit.
#
# Changes not staged for commit:
# (use \"git add <file>...\" to update what will be committed)
# (use \"git checkout -- <file>...\" to discard changes in working directory)
#
# modified: .git-annex/1G/X3/WORM-s309910751-m1301311322--l_fcompxe_ia32_2011.2.137.tgz.log
# modified: .git-annex/3W/Xf/WORM-s805764902-m1301312756--l_cproc_p_11.1.075_intel64.log
# modified: .git-annex/9Q/Wz/WORM-s1234430253-m1301311891--l_ccompxe_2011.2.137.log
# modified: .git-annex/FQ/4z/WORM-s318168323-m1301310848--l_cprof_p_11.1.075_ia64.log
# modified: .git-annex/FV/0P/WORM-s710135470-m1301311835--l_ccompxe_intel64_2011.2.137.log
# modified: .git-annex/Jk/zK/WORM-s374617670-m1301312705--l_ipp_7.0.2.137_intel64.log
# modified: .git-annex/Jx/qM/WORM-s599386592-m1301310731--l_fcompxe_2011.2.137.tgz.log
# modified: .git-annex/KX/w1/WORM-s35976002-m1301312193--l_tbb_3.0.6.174.log
# modified: .git-annex/VK/kv/WORM-s584342291-m1301312669--l_cproc_p_11.1.075_ia64.log
# modified: .git-annex/Vw/jK/WORM-s15795178-m1301310913--w_flm_p_1.0.011_intel64.zip.log
# modified: .git-annex/Zq/7X/WORM-s343075585-m1301312233--l_ipp_7.0.2.137_ia32.log
# modified: .git-annex/vW/v1/WORM-s736986678-m1301312794--l_cproc_p_11.1.075_ia32.log
#
no changes added to commit (use \"git add\" and/or \"git commit -a\")
</pre>
Up until now I have just been updating the status of the staged files by hand and commiting it on my mac x00, this probably isn't helping. I'd rather not lose the tracking information.
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 2"
date="2011-03-25T11:23:04Z"
content="""
FWIW, I wanted to suggest exactly the same thing.
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
Thought I'd ask how y'all are finding the current communication by this forum/website/git repo only.
Would there be a benefit to having an irc channel for git-annex?
Maybe a mailing list? (Any persuasive reason why it would be better than this forum?)
Are the existing RSS feeds on this site, for eg, new [[comments]] and posts to this forum, sufficient to keep up with
things?
--[[Joey]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 1"
date="2011-03-28T15:48:08Z"
content="""
No matter what you end up doing, I would appreciate a git-annex-announce@ list.
I really like the persistence of ikiwiki, but it's not ideal for quick communication. I would be fine with IRC and/or ML. The advantage of a ML over ikiwiki is that it doesn't seem to be as \"wasteful\" to mix normal chat with actual problem-solving. But maybe that's merely my own perception.
Speaking of RSS: I thought I had added a wishlist item to ikiwiki about providing per-subsite RSS feeds. For example there is no (obvious) way to subscribe to changes in http://git-annex.branchable.com/forum/git-annex_communication_channels/ .
FWIW, I resorted to tagging my local clone of git-annex to keep track of what I've read, already.
-- RichiH
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
nickname="Jimmy"
subject="comment 2"
date="2011-03-28T18:35:50Z"
content="""
I think the forums/website currently is sufficient, I do at times wish there was a mailing list or anonymous git push to the wiki as I find editing posts through the web browser is some times tedious (the lack of !fmt or alt-q bugs me at times ;) ). The main advantage of keeping stuff on the site/forum is that everything gets saved and passed on to anyone who checks out the git repo of the code base.
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 1"
date="2011-03-28T16:01:30Z"
content="""
Indeed, see [[todo/add_a_git_backend]], where you and I have already discussed this idea. :)
With the new support for special remotes, which will be used by S3, it would be possible to make such a git repo, using bup, be a special remote. I think it would be pretty easy to implement now. Not a priority for me though.
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 2"
date="2011-03-28T17:47:38Z"
content="""
On the plus side, the past me wanted exactly what I had in mind.
On the meh side, I really forgot about this conversation :/
When you say this todo is not a priority, does that mean there's no ETA at all and that it will most likely sleep for a long time? Or the almost usual \"what the heck, I will just wizard it up in two lines of haskell\"?
-- RichiH
"""]]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 3"
date="2011-03-28T20:05:13Z"
content="""
Probably more like 150 lines of haskell. Maybe just 50 lines if the bup repository is required to be on the same computer as the git-annex repository.
Since I do have some repositories where I'd appreciate this level of assurance that data not be lost, it's mostly a matter of me finding a free day.
"""]]