From 3a47b94369f92dd2b0ef09be03ac329e01d1aee0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://olivier.berger.myopenid.com/" Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:35:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: Mixing indirect mode and direct mode on different remotes --- ...mment_9_cff56dbcdfec60375c30d5b1b1c60614._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/direct_mode/comment_9_cff56dbcdfec60375c30d5b1b1c60614._comment diff --git a/doc/direct_mode/comment_9_cff56dbcdfec60375c30d5b1b1c60614._comment b/doc/direct_mode/comment_9_cff56dbcdfec60375c30d5b1b1c60614._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d2c752a543 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/direct_mode/comment_9_cff56dbcdfec60375c30d5b1b1c60614._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://olivier.berger.myopenid.com/" + nickname="obergix" + subject="Mixing indirect mode and direct mode on different remotes" + date="2013-08-17T20:35:40Z" + content=""" +I'd like to have an indirect mode repo on my laptop cloned on a cifs mount point (mounted off an SMB NAS) thus in direct mode. But all I can see on the clone after merge/pull is text files of length 207 chars containg the symlink in plain text. + +I guess this is what git manages internally for the symlinks... so I'm afraid git annex doesn't work in such case. + +Can you confirm that indirect and direct modes can coexist on clones of the same repo ? +"""]]