mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2012-04-23 10:36:02 -04:00
commit 3911b2db13
3 changed files with 32 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
doc/forum/What_can_be_done_in_case_of_conflict/comment_1_5ca86b099dfa08a50f656ea03bf1dcd9._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 1"
date="2012-04-23T14:29:03Z"
content="""
You handle conflicts in annexed files the same as you would handle them in other binary files checked into git.
For example, you might choose to `git rm` or `git add` the file to resolve the conflict.
[[Previous_discussion|forum/A_really_stupid_question]]
"""]]

10
doc/forum/__34__permission_denied__34___in_fsck_on_shared_repo/comment_3_c336b2b07cd006d378e5be9639ff17ec._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://christian.amsuess.com/chrysn"
nickname="chrysn"
subject="comment 3"
date="2012-04-23T14:14:28Z"
content="""
thanks, that's great. will there be a way to have sharedRepository work for shared remotes (rsync, directory) too, or is that better taken care of by acls?
@not thought of shared repos: we're having our family photo archive spread over our laptops, and backed up on our home storage server and on an rsync+encryption off-site server, with everyone naturally having their own accounts on all systems -- just if you need a use case.
"""]]

10
doc/forum/__34__permission_denied__34___in_fsck_on_shared_repo/comment_4_1339cd27ca2955f30b01ecf4da7d6fe8._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 4"
date="2012-04-23T14:35:39Z"
content="""
I'm not currently planning to support sharedRepository perms on special remotes. I suppose I could be convinced otherwise, it's perhaps doable for the ones you mention (rsync might be tricky). (bup special remote already supports it of course.)
thanks for the use case!
"""]]