Added a comment: couldn't STATE be used for KEY -> FILENAME(s) mapping?
This commit is contained in:
parent
a75aa38ca2
commit
37a6bef639
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="yarikoptic"
|
||||||
|
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
|
||||||
|
subject="couldn't STATE be used for KEY -> FILENAME(s) mapping?"
|
||||||
|
date="2017-07-11T22:05:49Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
just wondered...
|
||||||
|
at least in my attempt for zenodo special remote I did store zenodo's file deposition ID within the state to be able to request it back later on
|
||||||
|
alternative -- URL(s) I guess. Could be smth like exported:UUID/filename.
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue